4.7 Article

Defects in Glutathione System in an Animal Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox12051014

关键词

ALS; oxidative stress; wobbler mice; liver; hippocampus; cerebellum; glutamate cysteine ligase (GCL); glutathione synthetase (GSS); multidrug resistance protein (MRP); gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to determine the cause of decreased glutathione levels in the central nervous system of the wobbler mouse ALS model. Analysis of various tissues using qPCR, Western Blot, HPLC, and fluorometric assays revealed a decreased expression of enzymes involved in glutathione synthesis in the cervical spinal cord of wobbler mice. This deficient glutathione metabolism is likely responsible for an inefficient antioxidative system and elevated reactive oxygen species levels.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progredient neurodegenerative disease characterized by a degeneration of the first and second motor neurons. Elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and decreased levels of glutathione, which are important defense mechanisms against ROS, have been reported in the central nervous system (CNS) of ALS patients and animal models. The aim of this study was to determine the cause of decreased glutathione levels in the CNS of the ALS model wobbler mouse. We analyzed changes in glutathione metabolism in the spinal cord, hippocampus, cerebellum, liver, and blood samples of the ALS model, wobbler mouse, using qPCR, Western Blot, HPLC, and fluorometric assays. Here, we show for the first time a decreased expression of enzymes involved in glutathione synthesis in the cervical spinal cord of wobbler mice. We provide evidence for a deficient glutathione metabolism, which is not restricted to the nervous system, but can be seen in various tissues of the wobbler mouse. This deficient system is most likely the reason for an inefficient antioxidative system and, thus, for elevated ROS levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据