4.7 Review

Accumulation of Proline in Plants under Contaminated Soils-Are We on the Same Page?

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox12030666

关键词

oxidative stress; redox homeostasis; antioxidants; soil erosion; abiotic stress; salinity; metals; xenobiotics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Agricultural soil degradation is increasing at an alarming rate, influenced by climate change and intensified agricultural practices. Understanding the impacts of climate change and soil degradation on plant physiology is crucial for the development of effective strategies to mitigate crop productivity losses. Proline, an amino acid, has been recognized for its roles in plant cells under osmotic stress, showing a positive correlation between proline accumulation and tolerance to abiotic stress. However, recent studies question the assumption that proline accumulation always indicates improved stress resilience, suggesting the need for further biochemical and physiological endpoints.
Agricultural soil degradation is occurring at unprecedented rates, not only as an indirect effect of climate change (CC) but also due to intensified agricultural practices which affect soil properties and biodiversity. Therefore, understanding the impacts of CC and soil degradation on plant physiology is crucial for the sustainable development of mitigation strategies to prevent crop productivity losses. The amino acid proline has long been recognized for playing distinct roles in plant cells undergoing osmotic stress. Due to its osmoprotectant and redox-buffering ability, a positive correlation between proline accumulation and plants' tolerance to abiotic stress has been pointed out in numerous reviews. Indeed, proline quantification is used systematically by plant physiologists as an indicator of the degree of tolerance and a measurement of the antioxidant potential in plants under stressful conditions. Moreover, the exogenous application of proline has been shown to increase resilience to several stress factors, including those related to soil degradation such as salinity and exposure to metals and xenobiotics. However, recent data from several studies often refer to proline accumulation as a signal of stress sensitivity with no clear correlation with improved antioxidant activity or higher stress tolerance, including when proline is used exogenously as a stress reliever. Nevertheless, endogenous proline levels are strongly modified by these stresses, proving its involvement in plant responses. Hence, one main question arises-is proline augmentation always a sign of improved stress resilience? From this perspective, the present review aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the implications of proline accumulation in plants under abiotic stress induced by soil degradation factors, reinforcing the idea that proline quantification should not be employed as a sole indicator of stress sensitivity or resilience but rather complemented with further biochemical and physiological endpoints.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据