4.7 Article

Past and Future Influenza Vaccine Uptake Motivation: A Cross-Sectional Analysis among Italian Health Sciences Students

期刊

VACCINES
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11040717

关键词

influenza vaccines; vaccination hesitancy; medical students; information sources

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite low uptake, this study found that health sciences students were more likely to receive influenza vaccination if their main reason was to avoid spreading the infection to others. On the other hand, those who did not consider influenza as a severe disease were least likely to get vaccinated. Therefore, vaccination campaigns for health sciences students should emphasize the importance of protecting others and increase awareness of the severity of influenza.
Despite its effectiveness in the prevention of seasonal flu, influenza vaccination uptake remains low, even among healthcare workers (HCWs), despite their occupational risk. The aim of this study was to explore the association between main reasons for accepting or refusing influenza vaccination and the decision to receive the vaccination during both previous and following year among health sciences students. A multi-center, cross-sectional study was performed using a validated online questionnaire. Data were analyzed by performing univariable and multivariable logistic analysis. Data from over 3000 participants showed that avoiding the spread of infection to family members and the general population (aOR: 43.55), as well as to patients (aOR: 16.56) were the main reasons associated with the highest probability of taking the influenza vaccination the following year. On the contrary, not considering influenza as a severe disease was the reason associated with the lowest probability for past (aOR: 0.17) and future vaccination (aOR: 0.01). Therefore, the importance of vaccination to protect others should always be the core of vaccination campaigns for health sciences students, together with tools to increase their awareness of the severity of this disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据