4.7 Article

Genome-wide multi-omics analysis reveals the nutrient-dependent metabolic features of mucin-degrading gut bacteria

期刊

GUT MICROBES
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2221811

关键词

Mucin-degrading bacteria; genome annotation; nutrient-dependent fermentation; host immune response; the gut ecosystem

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the functional modules of mucin catabolism were assessed through bioinformatics-aided functional annotation. The metabolic pathways of A. muciniphila and R. gnavus were identified and their distinct metabolic features were found to influence the host immune response and gut ecosystem.
The prevalence and occurrence of mucin-degrading (MD) bacteria, such as Akkermansia muciniphila and Ruminococcus gnavus, is highly associated with human health and disease states. However, MD bacterial physiology and metabolism remain elusive. Here, we assessed functional modules of mucin catabolism, through a comprehensive bioinformatics-aided functional annotation, to identify 54 A. muciniphila genes and 296 R. gnavus genes. The reconstructed core metabolic pathways coincided with the growth kinetics and fermentation profiles of A. muciniphila and R. gnavus grown in the presence of mucin and its constituents. Genome-wide multi-omics analyses validated the nutrient-dependent fermentation profiles of the MD bacteria and identified their distinct mucolytic enzymes. The distinct metabolic features of the two MD bacteria induced differences in the metabolite receptor levels and inflammatory signals of the host immune cells. In addition, in vivo experiments and community-scale metabolic modeling demonstrated that different dietary intakes influenced the abundance of MD bacteria, their metabolic fluxes, and gut barrier integrity. Thus, this study provides insights into how diet-induced metabolic differences in MD bacteria determine their distinct physiological roles in the host immune response and the gut ecosystem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据