4.5 Review

Colorimetric sensing of heavy metals on metal doped metal oxide nanocomposites: A review

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.teac.2022.e00187

关键词

Heavy metals; Electrochemical sensing; Chemiluminescence sensing; Fluorometric sensing; Sensors doped metal-metal oxide; Polymers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heavy metal ion-containing pollution is a serious concern due to its risks to human and environmental health. Nanotechnologies, with their ability to control and measure objects at the nanoscale, particularly nanocomposites, have proven to be effective platforms for detecting heavy metal contamination. The development of sensitive and selective sensors is crucial for monitoring and cleaning up contaminated water.
Heavy metal ion-containing pollution has drawn a lot of attention. It presents thoughtful risks to the human situation and environmental system. Nanotechnologies can control, create, and measure objects on a molecular and atomic size between 1 and 100 nm. Their surface area to volume ratio is high. These are the most practical and are to blame for the easy accessibility, particularly for environmental cleanup. The nanocomposites have proven to offer remarkable qualities as platforms for heavy metal detection sensing. Monitoring the water quality is one of the key concerns of researchers in the modern period. Heavy metal contamination is a significant issue and poses a risk to ecological preservation. Due to this, several efforts are being made in present to develop sensitive, quick, and selective sensors. Reversibility, high specificity, and sensitivity are three unique and intriguing characteristics of colorimetric sensors that have grown in popularity. The particular features of nanomaterials, such as those based on metal and metal oxide, polymers, and carbon, make them beneficial for cleaning up the environment. We examined the most recent (2010-2022) advancements in metal composites for the treatment of metal ions in contaminated water in this review study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据