4.3 Article

Structural and magnetic phase transitions in Fe3Ge: A neutron diffraction study

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.063603

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A neutron diffraction study was conducted on a Fe3Ge alloy, uncovering the magnetic and structural phase transformations in a wide temperature range. The technique of complementary x-ray diffraction and Rietveld method allowed for accurate characterization of the magnetic properties of the alloy. The study revealed two ferromagnetic phases with different critical temperatures, as well as the temperature dependence of the magnetic moment components.
A detailed neutron diffraction study of a stoichiometric Fe3Ge alloy with different initial states in a wide temperature range (up to 1000 K) made it possible to accurately reveal the features of magnetic and structural phase transformations in it. The use of complementary x-ray diffraction and analysis of neutron diffraction patterns by the Rietveld method allowed reliably separating the nuclear and magnetic contributions to the intensity of the diffraction peaks and performing refinement of the Fe3Ge magnetic state characteristics. Both main phases appearing in Fe3Ge are ferromagnetic with T-C = 629 K (hexagonal, D0(19)) and T-C = 714 K (cubic, L-12). In D0(19), the presence of a spin-flip transition (T-sf = 385 K) was confirmed and the temperature dependence of the components of magnetic moment along the hexagonal axis and in the basal plane was obtained. It was shown that the transformation between ordered L1(2) and D0(19) structural states, predicted by the equilibrium-phase diagram, includes three steps: two diffusional stages (L1(2) -> A1, A3 -> D0(19)) and one displacive stage (A1 -> A3). The obtained structural data suggest that in Fe-Ge, as well as in Fe-Ga alloy, direct transitions between ordered phases are impossible. They should include a transition between disordered states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据