4.4 Article

Simultaneous space and phase resolved X-ray polarimetry of the Crab pulsar and nebula

期刊

NATURE ASTRONOMY
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 602-610

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41550-023-01936-8

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

X-ray polarization measurements of the Crab nebula and pulsar by the IXPE satellite showed a global toroidal magnetic field with large variations in local polarization, indicating a more complex turbulence distribution than expected. The pulsar's emission was found to be unpolarized, except for significant polarization in the core of the main peak. The nebula exhibited a patchy distribution of turbulence, contradicting simple expectations from numerical models.
X-ray polarization measurements of the Crab nebula and pulsar by the IXPE satellite reveal a global toroidal magnetic field with large variations in local polarization, suggesting a more complex turbulence distribution than anticipated. The Crab pulsar and its nebula are among the most studied astrophysical systems, and constitute one of the most promising environments where high-energy processes and particle acceleration can be investigated. They are the only objects for which significant X-ray polarization was detected in the past. Here we present the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) observation of the Crab pulsar and nebula. The total pulsar pulsed emission in the [2-8] keV energy range is unpolarized. Significant polarization up to 15% is detected in the core of the main peak. The nebula has a total space integrated polarized degree of 20% and polarization angle of 145 degrees. The polarized maps show a large variation in the local polarization, and regions with a polarized degree up to 45-50%. The polarization pattern suggests a predominantly toroidal magnetic field. Our findings for the pulsar are inconsistent with most inner magnetospheric models, and suggest emission is more likely to come from the wind region. For the nebula, the polarization map suggests a patchy distribution of turbulence, uncorrelated with the intensity, in contrast with simple expectations from numerical models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据