4.5 Article

Nitrogen and oxygen co-doped graphite felt gas diffusion electrodes for efficient hydrogen peroxide electrosynthesis

期刊

MOLECULAR CATALYSIS
卷 541, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcat.2023.113076

关键词

Hydrogen peroxide; Graphite felt; Gas diffusion electrode; Nitric acid modification; Electrosynthesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To enhance the efficiency and reusability of gas diffusion electrodes for H2O2 electrosynthesis, the graphite felt was modified with nitric acid and co-doped with nitrogen and oxygen. The modified graphite felt exhibited an increased amount of oxygen- and nitrogen-containing functional groups, such as carboxyl groups and pyridinic nitrogen, as characterized by SEM, contact angle measurements, FTIR, and XPS. Under optimized modification conditions, the electrode achieved a H2O2 yield of 42.2 mg·L-1·cm-2 and a current efficiency of approximately 80.0%. The electrode demonstrated stable electrogeneration performance of H2O2 over 13 cycles, highlighting its promising application prospects.
In order to improve the efficiency and reusability of gas diffusion electrodes for hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) electrosynthesis, we modified the graphite felt with nitric acid and constructed nitrogen-oxygen co-doped graphite felt/polytetrafluoroethylene/gas diffusion electrodes. The graphite felts before and after nitric acid modification were characterized by SEM, contact angle measurements, FTIR, and XPS, which showed that nitric acid modification resulted in a significant increase of oxygen-and nitrogen-containing functional groups (such as carboxyl groups and pyridinic nitrogen), which could improve the H2O2 yield and current efficiency. The H2O2 yield of the electrode prepared under the optimized modification conditions can reach 42.2 mg center dot L-1 center dot cm- 2, and the current efficiency can be maintained at about 80.0%. The electrode shows relatively stable performance of H2O2 electrogeneration during 13 cycles, and has a promising application prospect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据