4.2 Article

Flexibility in the Molecular Design of Acetylcholinesterase Reactivators: Probing Representative Conformations by Chemometric Techniques and Docking/QM Calculations

期刊

LETTERS IN DRUG DESIGN & DISCOVERY
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 360-371

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1570180812666150918191550

关键词

Acetylcholinesterase; oximes; docking; reaction mechanism; organophosphate; chemometrics

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo ao Ensino e Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior/ Ministerio da Defesa (CAPES/MD)
  4. MH CZ-DRO (FNHK)
  5. Excellence project FIMP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurotoxic organophosphate compounds (OP) are toxic and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors widely used as insecticides and pesticides in agriculture. This is a key enzyme in the search for new strategies for poisoning treatment by means of pesticides and insecticides. The standard OP intoxication treatment involves the administration of an anticholinergic to reduce spasms and convulsion as well as a cationic oxime capable of removing the OP compounds inside the AChE active site to reactivate the enzyme. In this paper, a theoretical strategy combining docking(MM), chemometric analysis and QM calculations was employed to check out the association and kinetic reactivation coefficients associated to oximes, confronting in vitro the data found in the literature before. The docking results were selected by means of the principal components analysis and submitted to QM calculations. The calculated thermodynamics and kinetics parameters revealed a good correspondence between the calculated intermolecular energy values of the oximes and experimental results, reinforcing the theoretical findings and confirming the theoretical strategy used as a suitable tool for the prediction of kinetic and thermodynamics parameters, which would be able to collaborate with the design of new oximes more effective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据