4.5 Article

A pilot scale hydrothermal liquefaction of sewage water grown Chlorella sorokiniana for bio-oil production-a sustainable integrated approach

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-023-04155-3

关键词

Microalgae; HTL; Bioremediation; Sewage water; Open raceway pond

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an innovative sustainable integrated route for efficient production of bio-oil by hydrothermal liquefaction of Chlorella sorokiniana grown in sewage water. The harvested microalgae were subjected to pilot-scale hydrothermal liquefaction, resulting in 60.43% bio crude oil. GCMS and FTIR analysis confirmed the presence of various hydrocarbons in the obtained bio-oil, indicating its potential as a high-quality fuel.
The study provides an innovative sustainable integrated route for efficient production of bio-oil through hydrothermal liquefaction of Chlorella sorokiniana grown in sewage water in an open race pond of 20,000-L capacity. The average specific growth rate and doubling time for C. sorokiniana was 0.1 h(-1) 6.9 h with reduction of 66.66%, ammonia 33.3% nitrate, 50% sulfate, 61.1% COD, and 58.8% of BOD respectively. The C. sorokiniana was harvested using auto flocculation cum decantation method and found to have 64.24% carbon and 12.08% hydrogen. The microalgae subjected to hydrothermal liquefaction in pilot scale 50 L HTL reactor for bio-oil production. 60.43 % of bio crude oil was obtained under optimized conditions. GCMS study reveals that bio-crude oil mostly contains hydrocarbons like amides, ketones, alcohols, amines, aldehydes, oxygenated compounds, fatty acids, and fatty acid methyl esters. The presence of alkanes, alkenes, aldehyde, amines, amides, esters, carboxylic acid, alcohols, and halo-compounds was also confirmed by FTIR. The presence of high concentration of hydrocarbons in the obtained bio-oil is an indicative of a high-quality oil that can be used in neat and blended form with conventional diesel fuel after some modification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据