4.5 Article

EMHD radiative titanium oxide-iron oxide/ethylene glycol hybrid nanofluid flow over an exponentially stretching sheet

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-023-04033-y

关键词

Hybrid nanofluids; Computational scrutinization; Exponential stretching sheet; Helmholtz-Smoluchowski velocity; Viscous dissipation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on the effective cooling of hybrid nanofluids in high temperature range, applicable to various thermal applications. Factors such as radiation, electromagnetohydrodynamics, viscous dissipation and Joule heating are considered in the study. The flow model is solved using numerical techniques and the outcomes are discussed through pictorial representations.
The hybrid nanofluids are effectively working in terms of cooling where the temperature range is high and includes a broad range of thermal applications including electronic equipment cooling, heat exchangers, manufacturing industry, automotive industry, heat pipes and solar energy. Due to these facts, the current research focusses on the titanium oxide-iron oxide/ethylene glycol hybrid nanofluid motion over an exponentially stretching sheet. The influences such as radiation, electromagnetohy-drodynamics (EMHD), viscous dissipation and Joule heating have also been considered into account. The flow model is con-verted and simplified to the system of ordinary differential equations by using similarity transformations and non-dimensional quantities. The resulting system is solved with the numerical procedure bvp4c Matlab technique. The outcomes of the present study are discussed through pictorial representations. It is concluded from the study that the stronger Grashof number declines the velocity profiles of titanium oxide/ethylene glycol nanofluid as well as titanium oxide ( TiO2)-iron oxide ( Fe2O3)/ethylene glycol ( C2H6O2 ) hybrid nanofluid. The thermal radiation enhances the temperature profiles of mono/hybrid nanofluids. The Nusselt number declines with the Eckert number.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据