4.6 Review

How to promote green travel effectively: a study of niche information interventions based on meta-analysis

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03095-2

关键词

Niche information interventions; Green travel behavior; Meta-analysis; Information type

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green travel is an effective way to conserve energy and reduce emissions, and consumer behavior plays a crucial role in its promotion. Through a meta-analysis of 22 English-language publications from 1977-2022, it was found that niche information interventions have a positive effect on promoting green travel behavior. Factors such as information type, test sample, intervention duration, intervention frequency, and intervention timing were identified to influence the intervention effect.
Green travel is an effective way of conserving energy and reducing emissions. It is the result of consumers' behavioral choices, and consumer behavior is largely influenced by external information. The question of whether and how the consumer uptake of intervention information affects consumer green travel behavior has yet to be systematically studied. Based on 22 English-language publications from 1977-2022, meta-analysis was used to quantify the effects of niche information intervention strategies on green travel behavior and to explore the relevant factors that influence the effect of interventions. The results indicated that niche information interventions had a positive effect on green travel behavior. Other factors such as information type, the test sample, intervention duration, intervention frequency and intervention timing are considered to affect the intervention effect through subgroup analysis. The optimal intervention modes were identified as follows: the information type of coupling at least three kinds of information, the non-student sample, an intervention duration of less than one month, an intervention frequency of once only, and the intervention timing of coupled antecedent and consequence interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据