4.7 Article

Forage Mass and Nutritive Value of Grain- and Forage-Type Soybean Cultivars Managed under Different Row Spacings and Clipping Heights

期刊

AGRONOMY-BASEL
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13020487

关键词

Glycine max; biomass; nutritive value

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to determine the herbage mass and nutritive value of forage soybean managed under different row spacing and stubble heights. The results showed that the Stonewall cultivar had the highest herbage mass and nutritive value, while Laredo had the lowest herbage mass. A stubble height of 10 cm resulted in increased herbage mass but decreased nutritive value compared to 20 cm. Row spacing did not consistently influence both herbage mass and nutritive values. Therefore, forage soybean should be considered for inclusion in forage-based livestock diets.
Soybean (Glycine max L.) is a high value crop that has been used as a forage since the early 1900s in the southern U.S. (e.g., Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida). Renewed interest has increased the use of soybean as a viable and economical high protein alternative to forage growers in the southern region. The objective of this study was to determine herbage mass (HM) and nutritive value of forage soybean managed under two row spacing (36 and 72 cm) and three stubble heights (10, 15, and 20 cm). Five cultivars were used 'Stonewall', 'Laredo', 'Tower of Leaves', Asgrow(R) 'AG64X8', and Asgrow(R) 'AG79X9' and sown at two locations (Shorter and Headland, AL). Forage was harvested in July and August during both years and HM was determined. Crude protein (CP) and fiber fractions were determined using near-infrared spectroscopy. Years and location did vary, but overall, Stonewall had the greatest (p < 0.026) HM (1706 kg DM ha(-1)) with a high nutritive value (124 g CP kg(-1), 449 g NDF kg(-1), and 372 g ADF kg(-1)). Laredo had the lowest HM (1169 kg DM ha(-1); p < 0.025). The 10 cm stubble height resulted in increased HM (1898 kg DM ha(-1); p < 0.0001) but decreased nutritive value (149 g CP kg(-1); 331 g ADF kg(-1); 413 g NDF kg(-1); p = 0.001) compared to 20 cm (179, 282, and 375 g kg(-1) for CP, ADF, and NDF, respectively). Row spacing did not consistently influence either HM or nutritive values. Due to its relatively good nutritive value and HM, forage soybean should be considered as a monoculture or in a mixed sward with other warm-season annual forages for inclusion in forage-based livestock diets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据