4.7 Article

Microbial Phytase in a Diet with Lupine and Extruded Full-Fat Soya Seeds Affects the Performance, Carcass Characteristics, Meat Quality, and Bone Mineralization of Fatteners

期刊

ANIMALS
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ani13101655

关键词

pigs; phytase; performance; fatty acid profile; meat quality; bone mineralization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of different doses of phytase on fatteners' performance, meat quality, bone mineralization, and fatty acid profile in diets including extruded soya and lupine seeds. The results showed that a higher dosage of phytase did not have significant benefits on pig performance and meat quality. However, it did increase phosphorus content in the meat and calcium content in the bones. Additionally, the fatty acid profile was also affected by the dosage of phytase.
This study aims to determine how different doses of phytase in diets including extruded soya and lupine seeds affect fatteners' performance, meat quality, bone mineralization, and fatty acid profile. Sixty pigs were divided into three treatment groups. The control group was offered a diet without phytase, whereas the Phy100 and Phy400 groups were provided with 100 g and 400 g of phytase per ton of their diet, respectively. The animals from both experimental groups were characterized by a significantly (p < 0.05) higher body weight gain and lower feed efficiency in the starter period than the control group. Unfortunately, their meat had lower (p < 0.05) fat content, gluteal muscle thickness, and water-holding capacity. In the meat, a higher phosphorus content (p < 0.05) was found, and in the bones, a higher calcium (for Phy400) content was found when phytase was added to the pigs' diet. The pigs from the Phy100 group tended to have higher mean backfat thickness and C18:2 n-6 content in their fat, but lower C22:5 n-3 content, than the other groups. A higher dosage of phytase is not necessary for the diets of fatteners with extruded full-fat soya and lupin seeds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据