4.7 Article

Immunogenicity and Efficacy of a Feed-Based Bivalent Vaccine against Streptococcosis and Motile Aeromonad Septicemia in Red Hybrid Tilapia (Oreochromis sp.)

期刊

ANIMALS
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ani13081346

关键词

red hybrid tilapia; streptococcosis; motile Aeromonad septicemia; feed-based bivalent vaccine; immuno-protective

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A newly developed feed-based bivalent vaccine has shown strong immune protection in red hybrid tilapia, effectively preventing infections by Streptococcus agalactiae and Aeromonas hydrophila, which cause streptococcosis and motile Aeromonad septicemia (MAS), respectively.
Simple Summary Vaccines play a pivotal role in the control of infectious diseases. This study investigated the immuno-protective efficacy of a newly developed feed-based bivalent vaccine against streptococcosis and motile Aeromonad septicemia (MAS) in red hybrid tilapia. The feed-based bivalent vaccine was found enhanced mucosal and systemic immunities in red hybrid tilapia. The feed-based bivalent vaccine also improved relative percentage survival (RPS) in red hybrid tilapia through protections against infections by Streptococcus agalactiae and Aeromonas hydrophila and partial cross-protections against Streptococcus iniae and Aeromonas veronii. Streptococcosis and motile Aeromonad septicemia (MAS) are the main bacterial diseases in tilapia culture worldwide, causing significant economic losses. Vaccination is an effective method of preventing diseases and contributes to economic sustainability. This study investigated the immuno-protective efficacy of a newly developed feed-based bivalent vaccine against streptococcosis and MAS in red hybrid tilapia. The feed-based bivalent vaccine pellet was developed by incorporating the formalin-killed S. agalactiae and A. hydrophila antigens into a commercial feed pellet with palm oil as the adjuvant. The bivalent vaccine was subjected to feed quality analyses. For immunological analyses, 900 fish (12.94 +/- 0.46 g) were divided into two treatment groups in triplicate. Fish in Group 1 were unvaccinated (control), while those in Group 2 were vaccinated with the bivalent vaccine. The bivalent vaccine was delivered orally at 5% of the fish's body weight for three consecutive days on week 0, followed by boosters on weeks 2 and 6. Lysozyme and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) on serum, gut lavage, and skin mucus were performed every week for 16 weeks. Lysozyme activity in vaccinated fish was significantly (p <= 0.05) higher than in unvaccinated fish following vaccination. Similarly, the IgM antibody levels of vaccinated fish were significantly (p <= 0.05) higher after vaccination. The bivalent vaccine provided high protective efficacy against S. agalactiae (80.00 +/- 10.00%) and A. hydrophila (90.00 +/- 10.00%) and partial cross-protective efficacy against S. iniae (63.33 +/- 5.77%) and A. veronii (60.00 +/- 10.00%). During the challenge test, fewer clinical and gross lesions were observed in vaccinated fish compared with unvaccinated fish. Histopathological assessment showed less severe pathological changes in selected organs than the unvaccinated fish. This study showed that vaccination with a feed-based bivalent vaccine improves immunological responses in red hybrid tilapia, and thus protects against streptococcosis and MAS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据