4.6 Review

Breath volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as biomarkers for the diagnosis of pathological conditions: A review

期刊

BIOMEDICAL JOURNAL
卷 46, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2023.100623

关键词

Volatile organic compounds; VOCs; Biomarkers; Exhaled breath; Breath sampling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The normal and abnormal/pathological status of physiological processes in the human organism can be characterized through Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) emitted in breath. These compounds have been recognized as valuable biomarkers for the rapid, accurate, non-invasive, and painless diagnosis of various diseases and health conditions. This study reviews the most promising results in the field of breath biomarkers and the common methods of detecting VOCs, while also providing a database of compounds for 16 different pathologies.
Normal and abnormal/pathological status of physiological processes in the human organism can be characterized through Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) emitted in breath. Recently, a wide range of volatile analytes has risen as biomarkers. These compounds have been addressed in the scientific and medical communities as an extremely valuable metabolic window. Once collected and analysed, VOCs can represent a tool for a rapid, accurate, non-invasive, and painless diagnosis of several diseases and health conditions. These biomarkers are released by exhaled breath, urine, faeces, skin, and several other ways, at trace concentration levels, usually in the ppbv (mg/L) range. For this reason, the analytical techniques applied for detecting and clinically exploiting the VOCs are extremely important. The present work reviews the most promising results in the field of breath biomarkers and the most common methods of detection of VOCs. A total of 16 pathologies and the respective database of compounds are addressed. An updated version of the VOCs biomarkers database can be consulted at: https://neomeditec.com/ VOCdatabase/

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据