4.6 Article

Operation Method of PV-Battery Hybrid Systems for Peak Shaving and Estimation of PV Generation

期刊

ELECTRONICS
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics12071608

关键词

photovoltaic; battery; battery energy storage system (BESS); PV-battery hybrid system; solar power generation estimation; peak load reduction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an operation method for PV-battery hybrid systems by estimating PV generation. The method aims to reduce peak load by predicting the maximum PV generation on a clear day and determining the charge and discharge set points of the battery. The effectiveness of the operation method was validated through simulation studies, showing a 30% reduction in peak load using the proposed algorithm.
Photovoltaic (PV)-battery hybrid systems, which are composed of PV arrays, batteries, and bidirectional inverters, can level the loads of traditional utility grids. Their objective is to supply predetermined active and reactive power to the power grid. This paper presents an operation method for PV-battery hybrid systems by estimating PV generation. Using the PV installation information, the maximum PV generation on a clear day was predicted and compared with historical data. The PV generation was estimated using historical data from 2007 to 2010. The method aims to reduce the peak load of the power system using the estimated load and PV generation of the next day. With the given weather information and load pattern for the next day, the charge and discharge set points of the battery can be determined by considering the initial SoC (State of Charge) and capacity of the battery. To compensate for the estimation error of the load and PV output, an operational margin was considered. This method can maximize system operation efficiency by fully utilizing the battery. The effectiveness of the operation method was validated through simulation studies. It was confirmed that the peak load could be reduced by 30% using the proposed algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据