4.6 Article

A User Purchase Behavior Prediction Method Based on XGBoost

期刊

ELECTRONICS
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics12092047

关键词

user behavior prediction; feature selection; XGBoost model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a prediction model based on XGBoost is proposed to predict user purchase behavior. By utilizing multi-feature fusion and analyzing feature importance, the XGBoost model demonstrates superior stability and algorithm efficiency compared to traditional machine learning algorithms.
With the increasing use of electronic commerce, online purchasing users have been rapidly rising. Predicting user behavior has therefore become a vital issue based on the collected data. However, traditional machine learning algorithms for prediction require significant computing time and often produce unsatisfactory results. In this paper, a prediction model based on XGBoost is proposed to predict user purchase behavior. Firstly, a user value model (LDTD) utilizing multi-feature fusion is proposed to differentiate between user types based on the available user account data. The multi-feature behavior fusion is carried out to generate the user tag feature according to user behavior patterns. Next, the XGBoost feature importance model is employed to analyze multi-dimensional features and identify the model with the most significant weight value as the key feature for constructing the model. This feature, together with other user features, is then used for prediction via the XGBoost model. Compared to existing machine learning models such as K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN), the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model outperforms with an accuracy of 0.9761, an F1 score of 0.9763, and a ROC value of 0.9768. Thus, the XGBoost model demonstrates superior stability and algorithm efficiency, making it an ideal choice for predicting user purchase behavior with high levels of accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据