4.6 Article

Ultrafast Energy Transfer Dynamics in a Cyanobacterial Light-Harvesting Phycobilisome

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr11061656

关键词

light-harvesting antenna; phycobilisomes; time-resolved spectroscopy; energy transfer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the energy transfer mechanism in the phycobilisomes (PBSs) of the thermophilic cyanobacterium Thermosynechococcus vulcanus NIES 2134 (T. 2134) using cryo-EM models resolved at near-atomic resolution and sub-picosecond time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. We identified four time components and revealed the energy transfer channels and rates in the PBSs. This study contributes to our understanding of energy transfer mechanisms in PBSs.
The phycobilisomes (PBSs) of cyanobacteria and red algae are their primary light-harvesting antennas, which play key role in light harvesting and energy transportation to the photosynthetic reaction center with extraordinarily high efficiency. The mechanism of energy transfer in PBS should be investigated with a tight combination between biological structural information and an ultrafast time-resolved dynamic analysis. We recently demonstrated the study of energy transfer in PBSs from a thermophilic cyanobacterium, Thermosynechococcus vulcanus NIES 2134 (T. 2134), with the cryo-EM model resolved at a near-atomic resolution. The time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy of the PBS with a sub-picosecond resolution was discovered at 77 K. Deconvolution of the fluorescence decay curve was then used to reveal the energy transfer channels and the associated transfer rates. Except for the fluorescence lifetimes of terminal emitters, four time components, i.e., 9 ps, 13 ps, 23 ps, and 55 ps, were recognized in the energy transfer in the PBSs. The energy transfer dynamics in the PBSs were further analyzed by combining the cryo-EM structure and the spectral properties in detail. The findings from this study aid in our understanding of the energy transfer mechanisms in PBSs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据