4.6 Article

Development of Anomaly Detectors for HVAC Systems Using Machine Learning

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr11020535

关键词

HVAC; fault detection and diagnosis; anomaly detection; artificial intelligence; machine learning; energy savings

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Faults and anomalous behavior in HVAC systems cause performance loss, energy waste, noncompliance with regulations, and discomfort among occupants. This study developed supervised and semi-supervised models using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) for fault detection and diagnosis. ANNs can capture nonlinear relationships among features and easily detect simultaneous faults. The performance of the models was evaluated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Balanced Accuracy Score (BAS).
Faults and anomalous behavior affect the operation of Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems. This causes performance loss, energy waste, noncompliance with regulations and discomfort among occupants. To prevent damage, automated, fast identification of faults in HVAC systems is needed. Fault Detection and Diagnosis (FDD) techniques are very effective for these purposes. The best FDD methods, in terms of cost effectiveness and data exploitation, are based on process history; i.e., on sensor data from automation systems. In this work, supervised and semi-supervised models were developed. Other than with regard to outdoor temperature and humidity, the input parameters of an HVAC system have few internal variables. Performance of traditional methods (e.g., VAR, Random Forest) is low, so Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) were selected, since they can capture nonlinear relationships among features and are easily optimized. ANNs can detect simultaneous faults from different classes. ANN metrics are easily evaluated. The ground truth is obtained from process history (supervised case) and from a mix of deterministic methods and clustering (semi-supervised case). The derivation of the ground truth in the semi-supervised case, and extensive comparison with advanced supervised models, set this work apart from previous studies. The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of the best supervised model was 0.032 over 15 min and 0.034 over 30 min. The Balanced Accuracy Score (BAS) of the best semi-supervised model was 86%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据