4.6 Article

Soil Destabilization Induced by Water Wetting Treatments Simulating Rain Infiltration Processes, Studied via Rheology and Granulometry

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr11061641

关键词

landslide; mudflow; slurry; natural hazard; soil organic carbon; dissoluble organic carbon; vane geometry; particle size distribution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil depleted of organic carbon is unstable and prone to triggering landslides and mudflows. The removal of water-soluble organic carbon has a similar destabilizing effect as the removal of the majority of soil organic carbon. Wetting procedures, such as rainfall, can further destabilize the soil and make landslides more likely to occur.
A soil depleted of its organic carbon content is typically destabilized, i.e., its capacity to maintain its microstructure intact under various stress conditions weakens, and consequently, landslides and mudflows can be triggered and propagated more easily. In a previous work, we showed with a rheological analysis that the removal of the sole water-soluble organic carbon destabilized the slurry very similarly to what occurs with the removal of the vast majority of soil organic carbon. In principle, the water-soluble organic carbon can be dissolved by rainfall, during which water can infiltrate the soil, eventually leaving it either by percolation or evaporation. These two processes are mimicked here with two different soil water wetting procedures. The stability of the treated (wetted) soils is studied with rheological and granulometric experiments. The former run on concentrated suspensions, while the latter run on very diluted ones. Despite this, the results agreed very well, indicating that the two wetting procedures induce the same destabilization of the soil which behaves as the one depleted by the whole water-soluble organic carbon. Our results concluded that a soil destabilized by a wetting procedure, i.e., by a rainfall event, will be more prone to trigger a landslide that will propagate more swiftly and will stop with more difficulties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据