4.4 Article

Effects of combination of melatonin and laser irradiation on ovarian cancer cells and endothelial lineage viability

期刊

LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 31, 期 8, 页码 1565-1572

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-016-2016-6

关键词

Melatonin; Laser irradiation; HUVECs; SKOV3; Heat shock protein 70

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main goal of anti-cancer therapeutic approaches is to induce apoptosis in tumor masses but not in the normal tissues. Nevertheless, the combination of photodynamic irradiation with complementary oncostatic agents contributes to better therapeutic performance. Here, we applied two different cell lines; SKOV3 ovarian carcinoma cells and HUVECs umbilical cord cells as in vitro models to pinpoint whether pharmacological concentration of melatonin in combination with photodynamic therapy induces cell cytotoxicity. The cells were separately treated with various concentrations of melatonin (0 to 10 mM) and photodynamic irradiation alone or in combination. Cells were preliminary exposed to increasing concentrations of melatonin for 24 h and subsequently underwent laser irradiation for 60 s with an output power of 80 mW in continuous mode at 675 nm wavelength and a total light dose of 13.22 J/cm(2). Cell viability, apoptosis/necrosis rates, and reactive oxygen species levels as well as heat shock protein 70 expression were monitored after single and combined treatments. A statistical analysis was performed by applying one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey's test. Combination treatment of both cell lines caused a marked increase in apoptosis/necrosis rate, reactive oxygen species generation, and heat shock protein 70 expression compared to incubation of the cells with each agent alone (p < 0.05). SKOV3 cancer cells expressed higher level of heat shock protein 70 under experimental procedure as compared to HUVECs (p < 0.05). Our results introduce melatonin as a potent stimulus for enhancing the efficacy of laser on induction of apoptosis in tumor cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据