4.7 Article

Effect of glycerol and sorbitol on cellulose-based biodegradable films

期刊

FOOD PACKAGING AND SHELF LIFE
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2023.101090

关键词

Plasticizer; Biodegradability; Cellulose; Films

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plastics are commonly used in packaging due to their strong mechanical and barrier properties. However, their lack of biodegradability poses significant environmental threats. Cellulose, with its strong and stiff molecular structure, biocompatibility, biodegradability, low toxicity, and abundance, is a promising alternative. This study investigates the effect of plasticizers glycerol and sorbitol on the properties of cellulose films, revealing that the addition of plasticizers improves tensile strength and elongation at break. These findings contribute to the development of novel biodegradable packaging films based on cellulose and the reduction of plastic pollution.
Plastics with strong mechanical and barrier properties make them a dominant packaging choice. Their lack of biodegradability, however, with a significant environmental threat, has driven the new generation of biode-gradable, renewable, and non-toxic packaging materials. Among several available choices, cellulose is highly suitable due to its strong and stiff molecular structure, biocompatibility, biodegradability, low toxicity, and abundance. However, cellulose-based films possess little flexibility and elongation. This study aims to understand the effect of plasticizers glycerol and sorbitol on cellulose film properties. Cellulose (0.6-0.8 g) was solubilized in 68%ZnCl2 solution and crosslinked with Ca2+ ions (50-400 mM) and plasticizer (5-25% of cellulose) to prepare films and characterized for physical and mechanical properties and soil biodegradability. Results reveal increased tensile strength and elongation at break with the plasticizer amount. The outcome is deemed to provide novel biodegradable packaging films based on cellulose and contribute to reducing plastic pollution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据