4.7 Article

Rapid In Vitro Assessment of Antimicrobial Drug Effect Bridging Clinically Relevant Pharmacokinetics: A Comprehensive Methodology

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15061671

关键词

pharmacokinetics; pharmacodynamics; antimicrobials; antimicrobial resistance; combination therapy; mathematical modeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a novel integrated methodology for rapid assessment of antimicrobial drug efficacy under clinically relevant pharmacokinetic conditions. The methodology involves automated collection of time-kill data, processing of the data using a mathematical model to determine optimal dosing regimens, and in vitro validation in a hollow fiber system. Proof-of-concept is provided through several in vitro studies, and future directions for refinement are discussed.
Rapid in vitro assessment of antimicrobial drug efficacy under clinically relevant pharmacokinetic conditions is an essential element of both drug development and clinical use. Here, we present a comprehensive overview of a recently developed novel integrated methodology for rapid assessment of such efficacy, particularly against the emergence of resistant bacterial strains, as jointly researched by the authors in recent years. This methodology enables rapid in vitro assessment of the antimicrobial efficacy of single or multiple drugs in combination, following clinically relevant pharmacokinetics. The proposed methodology entails (a) the automated collection of longitudinal time-kill data in an optical-density instrument; (b) the processing of collected time-kill data with the aid of a mathematical model to determine optimal dosing regimens under clinically relevant pharmacokinetics for single or multiple drugs; and (c) in vitro validation of promising dosing regimens in a hollow fiber system. Proof-of-concept of this methodology through a number of in vitro studies is discussed. Future directions for the refinement of optimal data collection and processing are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据