4.7 Article

Mechanisms of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis Active Peptide

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020540

关键词

Mycobacterium tuberculosis; antimicrobial peptides; treatment; mechanisms of action

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR) remains a threat to public health. A cationic host defense peptide has been identified with activity against M. tuberculosis and bactericidal effect against MDR M. tuberculosis. The peptide induces tube-shaped membranous structures, vesicle formation, and cell death in M. tuberculosis, and changes in secondary structure and aggregation in liposomes. It also targets essential proteins involved in mycolic acid synthesis and protein folding, impacting bacterial proliferation.
Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR) continues to pose a threat to public health. Previously, we identified a cationic host defense peptide with activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vivo and with a bactericidal effect against MDR M. tuberculosis at therapeutic concentrations. To understand the mechanisms of this peptide, we investigated its interactions with live M. tuberculosis and liposomes as a model. Peptide interactions with M. tuberculosis inner membranes induced tube-shaped membranous structures and massive vesicle formation, thus leading to bubbling cell death and ghost cell formation. Liposomal studies revealed that peptide insertion into inner membranes induced changes in the peptides' secondary structure and that the membranes were pulled such that they aggregated without permeabilization, suggesting that the peptide has a strong inner membrane affinity. Finally, the peptide targeted essential proteins in M. tuberculosis, such as 60 kDa chaperonins and elongation factor Tu, that are involved in mycolic acid synthesis and protein folding, which had an impact on bacterial proliferation. The observed multifaceted targeting provides additional support for the therapeutic potential of this peptide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据