4.7 Review

Apelin Is a Prototype of Novel Drugs for the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Adverse Myocardial Remodeling

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15031029

关键词

heart; ischemia; reperfusion; apelin; adverse remodeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The in-hospital mortality rate for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is 5-6%. Therefore, there is a need to develop novel drugs that can reduce mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Apelins could serve as the prototype for such drugs. Chronic administration of apelins has been shown to mitigate adverse myocardial remodeling in animals with myocardial infarction or pressure overload. The cardioprotective effect of apelins involves the inhibition of multiple pathways and processes, including apoptosis, ferroptosis, and the activation of various kinases and enzymes.
In-hospital mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is 5-6%. Consequently, it is necessary to develop fundamentally novel drugs capable of reducing mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Apelins could be the prototype for such drugs. Chronic administration of apelins mitigates adverse myocardial remodeling in animals with myocardial infarction or pressure overload. The cardioprotective effect of apelins is accompanied by blockage of the MPT pore, GSK-3 beta, and the activation of PI3-kinase, Akt, ERK1/2, NO-synthase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, matrix metalloproteinase, the epidermal growth factor receptor, Src kinase, the mitoK(ATP) channel, guanylyl cyclase, phospholipase C, protein kinase C, the Na+/H+ exchanger, and the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger. The cardioprotective effect of apelins is associated with the inhibition of apoptosis and ferroptosis. Apelins stimulate the autophagy of cardiomyocytes. Synthetic apelin analogues are prospective compounds for the development of novel cardioprotective drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据