4.7 Article

Improving Properties of Podophyllic Aldehyde-Derived Cyclolignans: Design, Synthesis and Evaluation of Novel Lignohydroquinones, Dual-Selective Hybrids against Colorectal Cancer Cells

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15030886

关键词

podophyllotoxin; terpenylhydroquinones; hybridization; lignohydroquinones; flow cytometry; cytotoxicity; cell cycle arrest; colchicine binding site

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New lignohydroquinone conjugates (L-HQs) were synthesized using the hybridization strategy and showed dual cytotoxic effect against colorectal cancer cells. These conjugates were obtained from natural product podophyllotoxin and semisynthetic terpenylnaphthohydroquinones. The results demonstrate the validity of the hybridization strategy and suggest further research on non-lactonic cyclolignans.
New lignohydroquinone conjugates (L-HQs) were designed and synthesized using the hybridization strategy, and evaluated as cytotoxics against several cancer cell lines. The L-HQs were obtained from the natural product podophyllotoxin and some semisynthetic terpenylnaphthohydroquinones, prepared from natural terpenoids. Both entities of the conjugates were connected through different aliphatic or aromatic linkers. Among the evaluated hybrids, the L-HQ with the aromatic spacer clearly displayed the in vitro dual cytotoxic effect derived from each starting component, retaining the selectivity and showing a high cytotoxicity at short (24 h) and long (72 h) incubation times (4.12 and 0.0450 mu M, respectively) against colorectal cancer cells. In addition, the cell cycle blockade observed by flow cytometry studies, molecular dynamics, and tubulin interaction studies demonstrated the interest of this kind of hybrids, which docked adequately into the colchicine binding site of tubulin despite their large size. These results prove the validity of the hybridization strategy and encourage further research on non-lactonic cyclolignans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据