4.7 Article

Development of a Peptide-Based Nano-Sized Cathepsin B Inhibitor for Anticancer Therapy

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041131

关键词

cathepsin B; bioconjugate; anticancer therapy; nanoparticle; peptide drug

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel peptide and drug conjugate (PDC) called RR-BA was developed using a cathepsin-B-specific peptide (RR) and bile acid (BA), which could self-assemble in an aqueous solution to form stable nanoparticles. The nano-sized RR-BA conjugate exhibited significant inhibitory effects on cathepsin B and showed anticancer effects against mouse colorectal cancer cells (CT26). In vivo experiments in CT26 tumor-bearing mice also confirmed its therapeutic effect and low toxicity. Therefore, the RR-BA conjugate holds promise as an effective anticancer drug candidate for targeting cathepsin B in cancer therapy.
Numerous cathepsin B inhibitors have been developed and are under investigation as potential cancer treatments. They have been evaluated for their ability to inhibit cathepsin B activity and reduce tumor growth. However, they have shown critical limitations, including low anticancer efficacy and high toxicity, due to their low selectivity and delivery problems. In this study, we developed a novel peptide and drug conjugate (PDC)-based cathepsin B inhibitor using cathepsin-B-specific peptide (RR) and bile acid (BA). Interestingly, this RR and BA conjugate (RR-BA) was able to self-assemble in an aqueous solution, and as a result, it formed stable nanoparticles. The nano-sized RR-BA conjugate showed significant cathepsin B inhibitory effects and anticancer effects against mouse colorectal cancer (CT26) cells. Its therapeutic effect and low toxicity were also confirmed in CT26 tumor-bearing mice after intravenous injection. Therefore, based on these results, the RR-BA conjugate could be developed as an effective anticancer drug candidate for inhibiting cathepsin B in anticancer therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据