4.7 Review

Recent Advances in Biocompatible Ionic Liquids in Drug Formulation and Delivery

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041179

关键词

biocompatible ionic liquid; drug solubility; drug formulation; drug delivery; bioavailability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of effective drug formulations and delivery systems is challenging. Ionic liquids (ILs) can address the challenges associated with traditional organic solvents. However, many ILs are non-biodegradable and toxic. The development of biocompatible ILs for drug formulations and delivery systems is important.
The development of effective drug formulations and delivery systems for newly developed or marketed drug molecules remains a significant challenge. These drugs can exhibit polymorphic conversion, poor bioavailability, and systemic toxicity, and can be difficult to formulate with traditional organic solvents due to acute toxicity. Ionic liquids (ILs) are recognized as solvents that can improve the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of drugs. ILs can address the operational/functional challenges associated with traditional organic solvents. However, many ILs are non-biodegradable and inherently toxic, which is the most significant challenge in developing IL-based drug formulations and delivery systems. Biocompatible ILs comprising biocompatible cations and anions mainly derived from bio-renewable sources are considered a green alternative to both conventional ILs and organic/inorganic solvents. This review covers the technologies and strategies developed to design biocompatible ILs, focusing on the design of biocompatible IL-based drug formulations and delivery systems, and discusses the advantages of these ILs in pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Furthermore, this review will provide guidance on transitioning to biocompatible ILs rather than commonly used toxic ILs and organic solvents in fields ranging from chemical synthesis to pharmaceutics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据