4.6 Review

Patient-derived xenografts or organoids in the discovery of traditional and self-assembled drug for tumor immunotherapy

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1122322

关键词

drug discovery; PDO; PDX; tumor immunotherapy; tumor microenvironment

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In addition to immune checkpoint inhibitors, self-assembly immunotherapy drugs have also been rapidly developed. Traditional tumor immunotherapy drugs are classified into five categories based on immune targets: immune checkpoint inhibitors, direct immune modulators, adoptive cell therapy, oncolytic viruses, and cancer vaccines. The emergence of self-assembled drugs with improved precision and environmental sensitivity offers a promising innovation approach. However, conventional evaluations using two-dimensional cell lines and animal models may be unsuitable for immunotherapy drugs, and patient-derived xenograft and organoid models better maintain tumor heterogeneity and immunity.
In addition to the rapid development of immune checkpoint inhibitors, there has also been a surge in the development of self-assembly immunotherapy drugs. Based on the immune target, traditional tumor immunotherapy drugs are classified into five categories, namely immune checkpoint inhibitors, direct immune modulators, adoptive cell therapy, oncolytic viruses, and cancer vaccines. Additionally, the emergence of self-assembled drugs with improved precision and environmental sensitivity offers a promising innovation approach to tumor immunotherapy. Despite rapid advances in tumor immunotherapy drug development, all candidate drugs require preclinical evaluation for safety and efficacy, and conventional evaluations are primarily conducted using two-dimensional cell lines and animal models, an approach that may be unsuitable for immunotherapy drugs. The patient-derived xenograft and organoids models, however, maintain the heterogeneity and immunity of the pathological tumor heterogeneity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据