4.6 Article

Case report: First report of isolated central nervous system lymphoblastic crisis in a child with chronic myeloid leukemia on dasatinib therapy

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1122714

关键词

pediatric chronic myeloid leukemia; isolated central nervous system blastic crisis; Dasatinib; tyrosine kinase inhibitor induced optic neuropathy; cerebrospinal fluid study

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most children with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are diagnosed in the chronic phase (CML-CP) and respond well to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, some patients may progress to blastic crisis (BC). Isolated central nervous system (CNS) BC is a rare condition and requires differential diagnosis from other causes. We report a case of isolated CNS lymphoblastic crisis in a child with CML-CP treated with dasatinib, emphasizing the importance of CSF study for differential diagnosis.
Most children with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) present with the chronic phase (CML-CP) at diagnosis, exhibiting an excellent treatment response to contemporary tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, despite TKI therapy, patients with CML-CP may progress to blastic crisis (BC). CML-BC rarely occurs in extramedullary sites, and isolated central nervous system (CNS) BC is an extremely rare condition. It may with present various neurologic symptoms that necessitates differential diagnosis from other causes such as TKI toxicity. Information on the diagnosis and treatment of this condition is lacking, as are well-established diagnostic criteria. Here, we report a case of isolated CNS lymphoblastic crisis in a child with CML-CP who was treated with dasatinib. The patient, an 8-year-old girl, was admitted owing to visual disturbance and severe headache. We highlight the importance of a CSF study for the differential diagnosis of CNS BC in patients with CML-CP who present with common neurologic symptoms during TKI therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据