4.6 Article

Diagnostic value of tumor-associated autoantibodies panel in combination with traditional tumor markers for lung cancer

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1022331

关键词

lung cancer; tumor-associated autoantibodies; biomarkers; tumor-associated antigens; early diagnostic value

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study confirmed the diagnostic value of 7 tumor-associated autoantibodies (AABs) for lung cancer and explored the potential improvement in diagnostic value by combining them with 7 traditional tumor-associated antigens (TAs).
IntroductionThe diagnostic value of 7 tumor-associated autoantibodies (AABs) including p53, PGP9.5, SOX2, GAGE7, GBU4-5, MEGEA1, and CAGE for the detection of lung cancer has shown inconsistency in several studies. This study aimed to confirm the diagnostic value of 7AABs and to explore whether the diagnostic value would be improved by combining them with 7 traditional tumor-associated antigens (CEA, NSE, CA125, SCC, CA15-3, pro-GRP, and CYFRA21-1) in clinical settings. MethodsThe plasma levels of 7-AABs were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 533 lung cancer cases and 454 controls. The 7 tumor antigens (7-TAs) were measured by Electrochemiluminescence immunoassay with Cobas 6000 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). ResultsThe positive rate of 7-AABs in the lung cancer group (64.00%) was significantly higher than that of healthy controls (47.90%). The 7-AABs panel was able to discriminate lung cancer from controls with a specificity of 51.50%. After combining the 7-AABs with 7-TAs, the sensitivity showed a significantly enhancement compared with 7AABs panel alone (92.09% vs 63.21%). In patients with resectable lung cancer, the combination of 7-AABs and 7-TAs improved the sensitivity from 63.52% to 97.42% DiscussionIn conclusion, our study found that the diagnostic value of 7-AABs was enhanced when combined with 7-TAs. This combined panel could be used as promising biomarker to detect resectable lung cancer in clinical settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据