4.6 Article

Progerinin, an Inhibitor of Progerin, Alleviates Cardiac Abnormalities in a Model Mouse of Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome

期刊

CELLS
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells12091232

关键词

Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome (HGPS); progerin; cardiac dysfunction; fibrosis; Lmna(G609G) model mouse; Progerinin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that aberrant splicing of the LMNA gene in HGPS patients leads to the production of a mutant protein called Progerin, and Progerinin can reduce its expression and improve aging phenotypes. Through experiments on HGPS model mice, it was observed that Progerinin can restore cardiac function and correct arterial abnormalities, providing encouraging evidence for the efficacy of Progerinin in treating cardiac dysfunction in HGPS.
Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome (HGPS) is an ultra-rare human premature aging disorder that precipitates death because of cardiac disease. Almost all cases of HGPS are caused by aberrant splicing of the LMNA gene that results in the production of a mutant Lamin A protein termed progerin. In our previous study, treatment with Progerinin has been shown to reduce progerin expression and improve aging phenotypes in vitro and in vivo HGPS models. In this record, cardiac parameters (stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF), fractional shortening (FS), etc.) were acquired in Lmna(WT/WT) and Lmna(G609G/WT) mice fed with either a vehicle diet or a Progerinin diet by echocardiography (from 38 weeks to 50 weeks at various ages), and then the cardiac function was analyzed. We also acquired the tissue samples and blood serum of Lmna(WT/WT) and Lmna(G609G/WT) mice for pathological analysis at the end of echocardiography. From these data, we suggest that the administration of Progerinin in the HGPS model mouse can restore cardiac function and correct arterial abnormalities. These observations provide encouraging evidence for the efficacy of Progerinin for cardiac dysfunction in HGPS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据