4.6 Article

Combining Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Oncology

Validation of Breast Cancer Risk Models by Race/Ethnicity, Family History and Molecular Subtypes

Anne Marie McCarthy et al.

Summary: This study compared the performance of four breast cancer risk prediction models and found that they had similar discrimination and calibration, with no difference by race. Model discrimination was poorer for certain cancer subtypes and better for women with high BMI. The combined BRCAPRO+BCRAT model showed improved calibration and discrimination for women with a family history of breast cancer. These results can inform risk-based screening approaches for women at high risk of breast cancer.

CANCERS (2022)

Article Genetics & Heredity

Statistical methods for Mendelian models with multiple genes and cancers

Jane W. Liang et al.

Summary: Risk evaluation is an important aspect of personalized clinical management for identifying individuals at higher risk of cancer due to heritable pathogenic variants. Mendelian models based on principles of genetics and Bayesian probability theory can predict the probability of carrying a pathogenic variant and developing cancer in the future. However, existing Mendelian models are limited to specific genes and syndromes and do not account for new gene-cancer associations discovered through panel testing. The development of PanelPRO addresses this limitation by creating a flexible and efficient Mendelian risk prediction framework that can incorporate an arbitrary number of genes and cancers, overcoming computational challenges.

GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY (2022)

Article Oncology

Prospective Evaluation over 15 Years of Six Breast Cancer Risk Models

Sherly X. Li et al.

Summary: The study evaluated the performance of six commonly used breast cancer risk models in a cohort of 7608 Australian women aged 50-65 over a 15-year follow-up period. The BOADICEA and IBIS models showed the highest discriminatory accuracy, but only BOADICEA was well-calibrated across the risk spectrum. Further prospective validation of risk models is needed to assess their clinical utility, particularly over the longer term.

CANCERS (2021)

Article Biology

Multi-syndrome, multi-gene risk modeling for individuals with a family history of cancer with the novel R package PanelPRO

Gavin Lee et al.

Summary: PanelPRO is an open-source software package for multi-gene, multi-cancer risk modeling with pedigree data, allowing for more accurate risk predictions and high impact on cancer prevention strategies and clinical decision-making. It is available for download for research purposes at https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/bayesmendel/panelpro.
Article Oncology

Performance of Breast Cancer Risk-Assessment Models in a Large Mammography Cohort

Anne Marie McCarthy et al.

JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2020)

Article Oncology

Cancer statistics, 2020

Rebecca L. Siegel et al.

CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2020)

Article Statistics & Probability

Risk Models for Breast Cancer and Their Validation

Adam R. Brentnall et al.

STATISTICAL SCIENCE (2020)

Article Oncology

10-year performance of four models of breast cancer risk:a validation study

Mary Beth Terry et al.

LANCET ONCOLOGY (2019)

Letter Oncology

Performance of BCRAT in high-risk patients with breast cancer

Mitchell H. Gail

LANCET ONCOLOGY (2019)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

A review of statistical updating methods for clinical prediction models

Ting-Li Su et al.

STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH (2018)

Article Oncology

Projecting Individualized Absolute Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in US Hispanic Women

Matthew P. Banegas et al.

JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2017)

Article Oncology

Projecting Individualized Absolute Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in US Hispanic Women

Matthew P. Banegas et al.

JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2017)

Review Oncology

Breast cancer risk models: a comprehensive overview of existing models, validation, and clinical applications

Jessica A. Cintolo-Gonzalez et al.

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT (2017)

Review Oncology

Modifiers of breast and ovarian cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

Roger L. Milne et al.

ENDOCRINE-RELATED CANCER (2016)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Net benefit approaches to the evaluation of prediction models, molecular markers, and diagnostic tests

Andrew J. Vickers et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Net benefit approaches to the evaluation of prediction models, molecular markers, and diagnostic tests

Andrew J. Vickers et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Meta-analysis and aggregation of multiple published prediction models

Thomas P. A. Debray et al.

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2014)

Article Oncology

Projecting Individualized Absolute Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in Asian and Pacific Islander American Women

Rayna K. Matsuno et al.

JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2011)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data

Hajime Uno et al.

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2011)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models A Framework for Traditional and Novel Measures

Ewout W. Steyerberg et al.

EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)

Article Oncology

Clinical Assessment of Breast Cancer Risk Based on Family History

Kaylene Ready et al.

JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK (2010)

Editorial Material Oncology

Putting Risk Prediction in Perspective: Relative Utility Curves

Stuart G. Baker

JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2009)

Article Statistics & Probability

Direct importance estimation for covariate shift adaptation

Masashi Sugiyama et al.

ANNALS OF THE INSTITUTE OF STATISTICAL MATHEMATICS (2008)

Article Oncology

International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

Kelly A. Metcalfe et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER (2008)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Updating methods improved the performance of a clinical prediction model in new patients

K. J. M. Janssen et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)

Article Oncology

Projecting individualized absolute invasive breast cancer risk in African American women

Mitchell H. Gail et al.

JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2007)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Super learner

Mark J. van der Laan et al.

STATISTICAL APPLICATIONS IN GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY (2007)

Review Statistics & Probability

Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation

Tilmann Gneiting et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION (2007)

Article Statistics & Probability

Evaluating prediction rules for t-year survivors with censored regression models

Hajime Uno et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION (2007)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Consistent estimation of the expected brier score in general survival models with right-censored event times

Thomas A. Gerds et al.

BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL (2006)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors

J Tyrer et al.

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2004)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Validation and updating of predictive logistic regression models: a study on sample size and shrinkage

EW Steyerberg et al.

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2004)

Article Oncology

The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer

AC Antoniou et al.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER (2004)

Article Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence

A theoretical study on six classifier fusion strategies

LI Kuncheva

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE (2002)

Article Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence

Random forests

L Breiman

MACHINE LEARNING (2001)