4.6 Article

DCVax-L Vaccination in Patients with Glioblastoma: Real Promise or Negative Trial? The Debate Is Open

期刊

CANCERS
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123251

关键词

DCVax-L; dendritic cell vaccination; glioblastoma; immuotherapy

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumor with a poor prognosis. Current standard treatment involves surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Despite advances in molecular biology, survival rates remain low. Immunotherapy has shown promise in treating glioblastoma, but further research is needed.
Simple Summary Glioblastoma is the most common of primary brain tumors, accounting for approximately 50% of intracranial malignancies. It is an aggressive neoplasm with a poor prognosis. To date, the standard of care is a treatment involving maximal surgery, radiotherapy concurrent with and followed by maintenance chemotherapy with temozolomide. Despite this multimodal approach and the continuous advances in molecular biology, median survival is 13-14 months and 5-year survival does not exceed 10% of patients. Therefore, the need to develop new treatments that can impact the survival of glioblastoma patients is urgent. After decades of research failures, immunotherapy timidly begins to give the first results in the treatment of this tumor. The publication of the phase III study on the use of the dendritic cell vaccine DCVax-L in glioblastoma has aroused much interest in neuro-oncology. We report the promising results of this trial, which, however, is worthy of a critical debate regarding both the special study design and the authors' conclusions. The lack of significant improvement in the prognosis of patients with GB over the last decades highlights the need for innovative treatments aimed at fighting this malignancy and increasing survival outcomes. The results of the phase III clinical trial of DCVax-L (autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccination), which has been shown to increase both median survival and long-term survival in newly diagnosed and relapsed glioblastoma, have been enthusiastically received by the scientific community. However, this study deserves some reflections regarding methodological issues related to the primary endpoint change, the long accrual period, and the suboptimal validity of the external control population used as the comparison arm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据