4.7 Review

Locoregional Flaps for the Reconstruction of Midface Skin Defects: A Collection of Key Surgical Techniques

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113700

关键词

head and neck reconstruction; midface skin defects; midface locoregional flaps; pedunculated flaps

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reviewed common surgical techniques for midface reconstruction, including the bilobed flap, rhomboid flap, facial-artery-based flaps (nasolabial flap, island composite nasal flap, retroangular flap), cervicofacial flap, paramedian forehead flap, frontal hairline island flap, keystone flap, Karapandzic flap, Abbe flap, and Mustarde flap. The analysis found that studying facial subunits, determining the location and size of the defect, selecting the appropriate flap, and preserving vascular pedicles are key factors for optimal outcomes.
Background: The reconstruction of midface skin defects represents a challenge for the head and neck surgeon due to the midface's significant role in defining important facial traits. Due to the high complexity of the midface region, there is no possibility to use one definitive flap for all purposes. For moderate defects, the most common reconstructive techniques are represented by regional flaps. These flaps can be defined as donor tissue with a pedunculated axial blood supply not necessarily adjacent to the defect. The aim of this study is to highlight the more common surgical techniques adopted for midface reconstruction, providing a focus on each technique with its description and indications. Methods: A literature review was conducted using PubMed, an international database. The target of the research was to collect at least 10 different surgical techniques. Results: Twelve different techniques were selected and cataloged. The flaps included were the bilobed flap, rhomboid flap, facial-artery-based flaps (nasolabial flap, island composite nasal flap, retroangular flap), cervicofacial flap, paramedian forehead flap, frontal hairline island flap, keystone flap, Karapandzic flap, Abbe flap, and Mustarde flap. Conclusions: The study of the facial subunits, the location and size of the defect, the choice of the appropriate flap, and respect for the vascular pedicles are the key elements for optimal outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据