4.7 Article

The Significance of CD20 Intensity Variance in Pediatric Patients with B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041451

关键词

CD20; B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia; pediatric patients; flow cytometry; immunophenotyping; survival analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This retrospective study evaluated the expression of CD20 in 114 patients with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), and found that CD20 expression was associated with disease evolution. The results suggest that CD20 expression level is an important factor in the assessment and treatment of pediatric patients with B-ALL.
B-cell precursor acute lyphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a common pediatric malignancy and patients may have significant benefits from monoclonal antibodies therapy with increased survival rates. Positive CD20 expression is identified in about half of these patients and its presence may serve as a prognostic factor in disease evolution. We performed a retrospective study including 114 patients diagnosed with B-ALL and evaluated the expression of CD20 through flow cytometry at diagnosis and on day 15. Additional immunophenotypic analyses as well as cytogenetic and molecular genetic analyses were also performed. We observed an increase in the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD20 between diagnosis-1.9 (1.2-3.26) and day 15: 6.17 (2.14-27.4), (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, we assessed that both diagnosis and day 15 CD20 MFI had an impact on RFS and OS, respectively, for cut-off values of >8.08 at diagnosis and >28.65 at day 15. In conclusion, CD20 expression appears to be a poor prognostic feature of B-ALL in pediatric patients. In this study, stratification of the outcome by the intensity of CD20 has implications concerning the allocation to rituximab-based chemotherapy and may offer new, potentially useful information for pediatric patients with B-ALL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据