4.7 Article

Vitamin D Status Determines the Impact of Metformin on Gonadotropin Levels in Postmenopausal Women

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113715

关键词

insulin resistance; gonadotrope secretory function; menopause; vitamin D

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metformin reduces FSH levels and tends to decrease LH levels in postmenopausal women, but only in those with normal vitamin D status or receiving vitamin D supplementation. Vitamin D status determines the impact of metformin on gonadotropin secretion. The drug does not affect the levels of other anterior pituitary hormones or vitamin D.
Metformin was found to decrease elevated levels of anterior pituitary hormones. Its impact on lactotrope secretory function was absent in women with vitamin D insufficiency. This study investigated whether vitamin D status determines metformin action on overactive gonadotropes. We compared the effect of six-month metformin treatment on the plasma levels of gonadotropins, TSH, prolactin, ACTH, estradiol, free thyroid hormones, IGF-1, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D, as well as on glucose homeostasis markers between three matched groups of postmenopausal women at high risk for diabetes: untreated subjects with vitamin D insufficiency (group A), untreated women with normal vitamin D status (group B), and individuals receiving vitamin D supplementation with normal 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (group C). Only in groups B and C did metformin reduce FSH levels and tend to decrease LH levels, and these effects correlated with baseline gonadotropin levels, baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, and the improvement in insulin sensitivity. Follow-up gonadotropin levels were higher in group A than in the other two groups. The drug did not affect circulating levels of TSH, prolactin, ACTH, estradiol, free thyroid hormones, IGF-1, or 25-hydroxyvitamin D. The obtained results suggest that the impact of metformin on gonadotropin secretion in women after menopause is determined by vitamin D status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据