4.7 Article

Establishment and Application of a Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony Remote Network Platform for ICU Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041570

关键词

patient-ventilator asynchrony; ICU mechanical ventilation; remote network platform; double triggering; ineffective triggering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a self-developed remote mechanical ventilation visualization network system to solve the problem of patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA). The algorithm model achieves good results in identifying ineffective triggering and double triggering abnormalities in mechanical ventilation. The system analyzes real-time respiratory data, identifies anomalies, and provides abnormal alarms, data analysis reports, and data visualizations to assist physicians in handling abnormalities.
Background: In the process of mechanical ventilation, the problem of patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is faced. This study proposes a self-developed remote mechanical ventilation visualization network system to solve the PVA problem. Method: The algorithm model proposed in this study builds a remote network platform and achieves good results in the identification of ineffective triggering and double triggering abnormalities in mechanical ventilation. Result: The algorithm has a sensitivity recognition rate of 79.89% and a specificity of 94.37%. The sensitivity recognition rate of the trigger anomaly algorithm was as high as 67.17%, and the specificity was 99.92%. Conclusions: The asynchrony index was defined to monitor the patient's PVA. The system analyzes real-time transmission of respiratory data, identifies double triggering, ineffective triggering, and other anomalies through the constructed algorithm model, and outputs abnormal alarms, data analysis reports, and data visualizations to assist or guide physicians in handling abnormalities, which is expected to improve patients' breathing conditions and prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据