4.7 Article

Evaluation of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress Markers in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12123935

关键词

obstructive sleep apnea; inflammation; oxidative stress; albumin; combined indices of inflammation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study of 259 OSA patients, specific haematological parameters such as albumin, neutrophil and monocyte counts, and the systemic inflammatory response index were found to be associated with reduced oxygen saturation. These findings suggest that these parameters may serve as promising markers for assessing oxygen saturation in OSA patients.
Background: The identification of circulating markers of oxidative stress and systemic inflammation might enhance risk stratification in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We investigated the association between specific haematological parameters, as easily measurable markers of oxidative stress and inflammation, and the degree of hypoxia during polysomnography using the apnea hypopnea index (AHI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), and oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), in OSA patients. Methods: Associations between polysomnographic parameters and demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics were assessed in a consecutive series of patients with OSA attending the Respiratory Disease Unit of the University Hospital of Sassari, north Sardinia (Italy), between 2015 and 2019. Results: In 259 OSA patients (195 males and 64 females), the body mass index (BMI) was significantly and positively associated with the AHI and ODI, and negatively associated with the mean SpO(2). No haematological parameter was independently associated with the AHI or ODI. By contrast, albumin, neutrophil, and monocyte counts, and the systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) were independently associated with a lower SpO(2). Conclusions: Our results suggest that albumin and specific haematological parameters are promising markers of reduced oxygen saturation in OSA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据