4.7 Article

Nasendoscopy to Predict Difficult Videolaryngoscopy: A Multivariable Model Development Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103433

关键词

airway management; intratracheal intubation; laryngoscopy; laryngoscopes; videolaryngoscopy; laryngeal diseases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This prospective study found that preoperative transnasal videoendoscopy (TVE) improves the prediction of difficult videolaryngoscopic intubation in adults with expected difficult airway management, especially when combined with the Simplified Airway Risk Index (SARI).
Background: Transnasal videoendoscopy (TVE) is the standard of care when staging pharyngolaryngeal lesions. This prospective study determined if preoperative TVE improves the prediction of difficult videolaryngoscopic intubation in adults with expected difficult airway management in addition to the Simplified Airway Risk Index (SARI). Methods: 374 anesthetics were included (252 with preoperative TVE). The primary outcome was a difficult airway alert issued by the anesthetist after Macintosh videolaryngoscopy. SARI, clinical factors (dysphagia, dysphonia, cough, stridor, sex, age and height) and TVE findings were used to fit three multivariable mixed logistic regression models; least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to select co-variables. Results: SARI predicted the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR] 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.58). The Akaike information criterion for SARI (327.1) improved when TVE parameters were added (311.0). The Likelihood ratio test for SARI plus TVE parameters was better than for SARI plus clinical factors (p < 0.001). Vestibular fold lesions (OR 1.82; 95% CI 0.40-8.29), epiglottic lesions (OR 3.37; 0.73-15.54), pharyngeal secretion retention (OR 3.01; 1.05-8.63), restricted view on rima glottidis <50% (OR 2.13; 0.51-8.89) and >= 50% (OR 2.52; 0.44-14.56) were concerning. Conclusion: TVE improved prediction of difficult videolaryngoscopy in addition to traditional bedside airway examinations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据