4.7 Article

Value of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Diagnosing Mild Asthma Responsive to Inhaled Corticosteroids

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093330

关键词

mild asthma; fractional exhaled nitric oxide; methacholine provocation test; diagnostic accuracy; sensitivity; specificity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in mild asthma and found that FeNO has insufficient sensitivity and specificity in this condition.
Background: Mild asthma is often characterized by normal spirometric values and a negative bronchodilation test (BDT), which makes accurate diagnosis challenging. The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in mild asthma. Methods: In adults with symptoms suggestive of asthma and normal spirometry values, BDT, FeNO, BPT and skin prick testing were performed. Patients with positive BPT started inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy. Those with positive response to ICS were considered asthmatics. Results: There were 142 asthmatics and 140 non-asthmatics. No significant difference was found in BDT between the groups, p = 0.233. Median FeNO levels were significantly higher in the asthma group (49.5 ppb) than in the non-asthma group (23 ppb), p < 0.001. BPT was positive in 145 (51.42%) and negative in 137 (48.58%) patients. Positive response to ICS treatment was recorded in 142/145 (97.9%) patients. In diagnosing asthma, FeNO = 25 ppb had a sensitivity of 75.4% and specificity of 47.9%. Conclusions: FeNO has insufficient sensitivity and specificity in mild asthma and the application of BPT is often necessary to establish an accurate diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据