4.8 Article

VANGL2 inhibits antiviral IFN-I signaling by targeting TBK1 for autophagic degradation

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 9, 期 25, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adg2339

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, VANGL2 was found to be an IFN-inducible negative feedback regulator that suppresses IFN-I signaling during VSV infection. VANGL2 interacts with TBK1 and promotes the autophagic degradation of TBK1 via K48-linked polyubiquitination mediated by TRIP. Myeloid-specific deletion of VANGL2 in mice results in enhanced IFN-I production against VSV infection and improved survival. These findings reveal a negative feedback loop of IFN-I signaling through the VANGL2-TRIP-TBK1-OPTN axis and highlight the importance of the crosstalk between IFN-I and autophagy in preventing viral infection. VANGL2 could be a potential clinical therapeutic target for viral infectious diseases, including COVID-19.
Stringent control of type I interferon (IFN-I) signaling is critical to potent innate immune responses against viral infection, yet the underlying molecular mechanisms are still elusive. Here, we found that Van Gogh-like 2 (VANGL2) acts as an IFN-inducible negative feedback regulator to suppress IFN-I signaling during vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) infection. Mechanistically, VANGL2 interacted with TBK1 and promoted the selective autophagic degradation of TBK1 via K48-linked polyubiquitination at Lys(372) by the E3 ligase TRIP, which serves as a recognition signal for the cargo receptor OPTN. Furthermore, myeloid-specific deletion of VANGL2 in mice showed enhanced IFN-I production against VSV infection and improved survival. In general, these findings revealed a negative feedback loop of IFN-I signaling through the VANGL2-TRIP-TBK1-OPTN axis and highlighted the cross-talk between IFN-I and autophagy in preventing viral infection. VANGL2 could be a potential clinical therapeutic target for viral infectious diseases, including COVID-19.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据