4.5 Review

Sedative Choice in Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: A Neuropharmacology-Based Review

期刊

LARYNGOSCOPE
卷 127, 期 1, 页码 273-279

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/lary.26132

关键词

Obstructive sleep apnea; drug-induced sleep endoscopy; upper airway; neuropharmacology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine the suitability of commonly used agents for drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) based on agent-specific neuropharmacology. Data Sources: PubMed. Review Methods: A literature search of the PubMed database was performed on January 1, 2016. A two-layered search strategy was performed to identify relevant pharmacologic agents and articles related to neuropharmacology for these agents. The first search identified relevant pharmacologic agents; the second search examined agents with greater than five results from search 1, along with medical subject headings respiration, sleep, pharmacology, and/or [respective agent] (e.g., propofol). Articles not in English were excluded. Bibliographies of pertinent articles were hand-searched for additional articles. Results: Three agents were commonly identified from search 1: propofol, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine with 44, 13, and 6 results, respectively. Of note, 11 results utilized coinduction with midazolam and propofol. Search 2 for propofol, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine retrieved 219, 220, and 26 results, respectively. Eleven results for propofol, 4 for midazolam, and 9 for dexmedetomidine were found to be related to their neuropharmacology. Conclusion: The current review demonstrates relatively few investigations seeking to characterize the neuropharmacologic suitability of DISE agents. Compared to propofol and midazolam, dexmedetomidine's mechanism of action appears most likely to induce natural sleep pathways. Further study of its effect on upper airway collapsibility (critical closing pressure) and pharyngeal muscle tone (genioglossus electrode electromyography) are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据