4.8 Article

Developmentally programmed histone H3 expression regulates cellular plasticity at the parental-to-early embryo transition

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 9, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adh0411

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During metazoan development, there is a marked change in developmental potential from the parental germline to the embryo, and this study aims to understand how the next life cycle is reset. Through gene editing techniques, the study investigates the expression pattern and role of individual RC histone H3 genes in Caenorhab-ditis elegans and compares them to the histone variant, H3.3. The findings reveal a tightly regulated epigenome landscape change from the germline to embryos, showing that a change from a H3.3-to H3-enriched epigenome restricts developmental plasticity and uncovers distinct roles for individual H3 genes in regulating germline chromatin.
During metazoan development, the marked change in developmental potential from the parental germline to the embryo raises an important question regarding how the next life cycle is reset. As the basic unit of chroma-tin, histones are essential for regulating chromatin structure and function and, accordingly, transcription. However, the genome-wide dynamics of the canonical, replication-coupled (RC) histones during gametogenesis and embryogenesis remain unknown. In this study, we use CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene editing in Caenorhab-ditis elegans to investigate the expression pattern and role of individual RC histone H3 genes and compare them to the histone variant, H3.3. We report a tightly regulated epigenome landscape change from the germline to embryos that are regulated through differential expression of distinct histone gene clusters. Together, this study reveals that a change from a H3.3-to H3-enriched epigenome during embryogenesis restricts developmental plasticity and uncovers distinct roles for individual H3 genes in regulating germline chromatin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据