4.6 Article

Challenges resulting from urban density and climate change for the EU energy transition

期刊

NATURE ENERGY
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 397-412

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41560-023-01232-9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dense urban morphologies exacerbate the urban heat island phenomenon, making cities more susceptible to extreme climate events. A modelling framework is developed to assess the combined impact of climate variations and urban densification on renewable energy integration in European cities, revealing significant changes in wind speed and temperature and increased energy demand. Failure to consider extreme climate events will reduce power supply reliability, particularly in dense urban areas of southern Europe.
Dense urban morphologies further amplify extreme climate events due to the urban heat island phenomenon, rendering cities more vulnerable to extreme climate events. Here we develop a modelling framework using multi-scale climate and energy system models to assess the compound impact of future climate variations and urban densification on renewable energy integration for 18 European cities. We observe a marked change in wind speed and temperature due to the aforementioned compound impact, resulting in a notable increase in both peak and annual energy demand. Therefore, an additional cost of 20-60% will be needed during the energy transition (without technology innovation in building) to guarantee climate resilience. Failure to consider extreme climate events will lower power supply reliability by up to 30%. Energy infrastructure in dense urban areas of southern Europe is more vulnerable to the compound impact, necessitating flexibility improvements at the design phase when improving renewable penetration levels. Understanding the impact of future climate variations and urban densification is key to planning renewable energy integration. By developing a multi-scale spatio-temporal modelling framework, Perera et al. reveal changes in wind speed and temperature across European cities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据