4.6 Article

Utilizing a Siloxane-Modified Organic Semiconductor for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting

期刊

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 2595-2602

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00755

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the potential of using diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP)based pi-conjugated polymers as hole transport layer material in heteroatom-doped hematite (Ti-Fe2O3/Ge-Fe2O3) photoanodes for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. The siloxane-modified pi-conjugated polymer (P-Si) exhibited high carrier mobility and stability, leading to a 1.8-fold increase in photocurrent density and improved stability compared to Ge-doped porous Fe2O3 (Ge-PH). This study demonstrated the successful use of inherently unstable pi-conjugated polymers as a hole extracting/transport medium for efficient and stable water splitting.
Weexplore the potential of employing diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP)based pi-conjugated OSs as a hole transport layer material inheteroatom-doped hematite (Ti-Fe2O3/Ge-Fe2O3) photoanodes for efficient photoelectrochemicalwater splitting. The siloxane-modified pi-conjugated polymer(P-Si) with a high carrier mobility and crystallinity revealedgreat potential to extract holes by forming a built-in potential withhematite photoanodes while showing high stability in an alkaline electrolytefor photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Because of the easy holeextraction and subsequent fast hole transport property of the P-Si interlayer between NiFe-(OH)( x ) and Ge-doped porous Fe2O3(Ge-PH), NiFe-(OH)( x )/P-Si/Ge-PH showed a 1.8-fold increasein photocurrent density (4.57 mA cm(-2) at 1.23 V-RHE) with a cathodic shift of the onset potential (0.735 V-RHE) and good stability for 65 h compared to Ge-PH. This studydemonstrates the successful use of inherently unstable pi-conjugatedOSs as a hole extracting/transport medium in a photoanode, addressingthe intrinsic recombination issues of hematite for efficient and stablewater splitting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据