4.6 Article

Origin of Phase Transitions in Inorganic Lead Halide Perovskites: Interplay between Harmonic and Anharmonic Vibrations

期刊

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
卷 8, 期 7, 页码 3016-3024

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00881

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The phase transitions of inorganic lead halide perovskites (ILHPs) are influenced by both harmonic and anharmonic vibrations, as revealed through lattice dynamics and multiphonon theory calculations, and verified by diffraction experiments. The study sheds light on the crucial role of harmonic vibrations in stabilizing the γ-phase of CsPbI3 and the driving force of anharmonic vibrations in the transitions between different phases of CsPbX3. These structural dynamics significantly affect the thermal conductivity and carrier relaxation, providing guidelines for manipulating the lattice dynamics of ILHPs.
Inorganiclead halide perovskites (ILHPs) exhibit a series of phasetransitions, and stabilization of the phases with desirable optoelectronicproperties remains a major challenge. However, the intrinsic originsof structural instabilities in CsPbX3 (X = Br, I) are stillelusive. Herein, the important role of harmonic and anharmonic vibrationsin influencing thermodynamic fluctuations of ILHPs was revealed, throughcombined lattice dynamics and multiphonon theory calculations, andverified by diffraction experiments. Our results demonstrate thatthe transition between & delta;- and & gamma;-CsPbI3 is drivenby harmonic vibrations, unveiling the mysterious mechanism for stabilizing & gamma;-CsPbI3 via applying strain. Moreover, the successivetransitions from the & alpha;- to & beta;- and & beta;- to & gamma;-phasesof CsPbX3 are driven by anharmonic vibrations. These structuraldynamics are strongly coherent with the phonon diffuse scattering,substantially affecting the thermal conductivity and carrier relaxation.This work provides guidelines for maintaining favorable ILHP phasesthrough delicately manipulating their lattice dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据