4.6 Article

Enabling Multi-electron Reactions in NASICON Positive Electrodes for Aqueous Zinc-Metal Batteries

期刊

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02837

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the effect of Cr substitution on the performance of Na3V2-xCrx(PO4)(3) cathode material for aqueous zinc-metal batteries was investigated. It was found that the Cr substitution significantly improved the rate capability and cycling stability, with the optimal Na3V1.5Cr0.5(PO4)(3) electrode demonstrating 68% capacity retention after 10,000 cycles at 1000 mA g(-1). The research also revealed a two-electron reaction mechanism for Zn-ion storage in NASICON-type cathodes, demonstrating the feasibility of multi-electron reactions in aqueous zinc batteries and providing insights for the design of advanced cathode materials for other aqueous batteries.
Sodium superionic conductor (NASICON)-structured compounds with a robust polyanionic framework, e.g., Na3V2(PO4)(3), have been considered as promising cathode candidates for rechargeable batteries due to their open 3D structure and high thermal stability. However, their practical implementation in aqueous batteries is hindered by their structural instability during the charge/discharge process. Herein, Na3V2-xCrx(PO4)(3) is investigated as a cathode material for aqueous zinc-metal batteries. It is identified that the Cr substitution has a significant effect on improving its rate capability and cycling stability. As a result, the optimal Na3V1.5Cr0.5(PO4)(3) electrode delivers an ultra-stable cycling performance (68% capacity retention after 10,000 cycles at 1000 mA g(-1)). A two-electron reaction mechanism between V4+/V3+ and V5+/V4+ redox couples has been revealed during the electrochemical process for Zn-ion storage. This work verifies the feasibility of multi-electron reactions in NASICON-type cathodes for aqueous zinc batteries and sheds light on designing advanced cathode materials for other aqueous batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据