4.3 Article

Optimization of processing conditions to enhance antioxidant and carotenoid contents of carrot juice

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11694-023-01950-4

关键词

Carrot; Juice; Antioxidant; Blanching; Sonication

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carrot is a popular vegetable with a mild, sweet flavor and is rich in carotenoids, which have antioxidant properties. This study investigated how carrot pre-treatment affected the antioxidant qualities of carrot juice. The results showed that carrot juice treated with sonication for 2 minutes and blanched at 95 degrees C for 9 minutes had the highest carotenoid yield and antioxidant activity.
Carrot is one of the most widely consumed vegetables in the world. Its mild, sweet flavour lends itself to all kinds of combinations in the kitchen and appeals both to young and old alike. The main carotenoids found in carrots (raw, cooked or in juice) are beta-carotene, lutein and zeaxanthin. Carotenoids are compounds known for their antioxidant properties, i.e. they are able to neutralise free radicals in the body. Consumption of foods rich in carotenoids is thought to be linked to a lower risk of several diseases, such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases and certain diseases associated with ageing. The purpose of the present work was to determine how carrot pre-treatment (blanching with or without sonication, duration, and temperature) affected the antioxidant qualities of carrot juice. Carrots were blanched in ordinary and acidified water for 4, 6, 8, and 10 min at 80, 90, and 100 degrees C. The juice was extracted and sonicated for 2 min at 15 degrees C. After a preliminary study, a surface response methodology experimental design was conducted. The study's results indicate that carrot juice treated with sonication for 2 min and blanched at 95 degrees C for 9 min had the highest yield of carotenoids and, therefore, the highest antioxidant activity. Based on these findings, we conclude that combining blanching with sonication is a practical option for the food industry to obtain the benefits of both processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据